Friday, October 9, 2009

Salazar's Wild Horse Plan Earns Two Big Thumbs Up

Interesting reactions from stakeholders in the wild horse community are surfacing now that Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar has published his plan to overhaul the BLM's wild horse and burro management plan by establishing a series of sanctuaries around the country for wild horses.

Click here to read about the actual plan announced by Salazar and my reaction to it.

Wild horse advocate Madeleine Pickens of Texas, who months ago had petitioned the federal government to turn over the management of the wild horses to her, has come out with a statement of support for Salazar's proposal. She published this today:

"I am delighted that the Secretary of the Interior has announced reforms for the Wild Horse and Burro Program. Much of what the Secretary said yesterday echoes what I have said over the past eighteen months. Those concerns about the existing BLM program led me to seek a wild horse sanctuary/visitor center that would be available to the American people.

"It is gratifying to know that the effort I have made the past year and a half to offer this project for the sake of the wild horses and the American people has borne fruit in Washington. I respect Secretary Salazar’s forthright candor in calling attention to this serious problem which has been ignored by the BLM for many years under previous administration.

"I will support Secretary Salazar’s efforts, and will gladly compete to offer the wild horse sanctuary that I have planned to the BLM as one of the facilities proposed by Secretary Salazar."

Meanwhile, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) expressed more cautious optimism in reaction to the plan. Their press release says that the plan takes federal management of wild horses from a scheme that is "often inefficient, costly and inhumane to one which is technologically advanced, fiscally sound and more humane."

One fertility control method supported by The HSUS is the immunocontraception vaccine Porcine Zona Pellucida (PZP) which HSUS claims has tremendous potential for managing wild horses in an effective, humane and cost-effective manner. Peer-reviewed studies quoted by HSUS have shown that by treating more mares with this drug and returning them to the range, rather than detaining them indefinitely in holding centers, the cost of managing wild horses could be reduced by as much as 14 percent per year, saving taxpayers more than $6 million annually, according to HSUS projections.

BLM's efforts to explore and develop new, innovative ways to manage its wild horse program come in the wake of a firestorm of controversy following the agency's announcement in June 2008 that the agency would consider euthanizing or selling for slaughter more than 10,000 wild horses currently housed in federal holding facilities as a solution for its fiscal problems. The disturbing announcement generated an enormous amount of public and congressional opposition to proposed plan and the call for a more progressive, humane one.

What you are reading here is politics. Wild horses can't vote; Congress will decide what their fate will be. Both Pickens and HSUS know that and are prepared to play ball with the Department of the Interior and Congress to do what they believe is best for the horses, who are protected under a federal law, enforcement of which many think the BLM has botched in favor of shared land use of western public acreage where the horses roam.

This latest chapter is just beginning and it's not known who else will come forward; for now, Pickens and HSUS are publicly expressing interest and approval of the idea of a new way forward.

That is what diplomacy and tact are all about. In the Fox News way of expressing our views, we sometimes forget that. Politics is not just Cooper Anderson and the CNN model of polar opposites presenting their views and talking over each other. If he had people on his show at night who were the diplomats who craft the solutions to polarized issues, no one would watch. And those people are too busy working, anyway.

In July, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 1018, the Restoring Our American Mustangs (ROAM) Act, championed by Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick Rahall and National Parks, Forests and Public Lands Subcommittee Chairman Raúl Grijalva. The legislation provided an even more comprehensive set of reforms, including restoring the longstanding prohibition on commercial sale and slaughter of wild horses and burros, and prohibiting euthanasia of healthy and adoptable wild horses in federal care.

As with all things political, timing is everything and every piece of legislation must be passed by both bodies of Congress. Often each body initiates legislation on an issue like this and there is lengthy commitee hearing session time to endure. Much legislation never makes it out of committee for an actual vote.

Is it possible that both ROAM's sale and slaughter prohibitions and a national sanctuary system could come out of the same Congress?

Madeleine Pickens and her supporters sent more than 11,000 emails to Ken Salazar in the last six months about the wild horse sanctuary concept. Guess what? The concept got through to him.

Keep your eye on this blog and on the key stakeholders to see what will happen next in this quickly developing story. Will Congressional powers give these already-protected animals the priority attention they deserve or will they drag their feet? Wild horses on public lands need a vote of confidence from Washington.

16 Comments:

At October 10, 2009 2:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm in Oklahoma, we have thousands of wild horses turned out on more than 30,000 acres. The land is well managed with horses rotating between pastures of 5,000 acres per area. When you have states with this kind of large ranches it's easy to see how this will work (it has been working for years and years). Some one like the King Ranch (at the Mexico, Texas border) who has a interest in tourism this would be something that might interest them. Because your in a state that has no large parcells of land don't think other States wouldn't jump at the chance to promote tourism.

 
At October 10, 2009 2:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

HSUS solution to anything and everything is killing off the animals. To turn wild horses over to education and tourism is against everything HSUS stands for. According to HSUS you can't keep them, ride them, eat them, wear them or use them for ANYTHING.

 
At October 10, 2009 3:45 PM, Blogger Fran Jurga said...

Reply to Anonymous #1--I agree! And I am sure that is what Madeleine Pickens has in mind too but Mr. Salazar specifically mentioned sanctuaries in the eastern states. Also every state is subject to environmental laws that protect any endangered species already residing on the land in question--remember the snail darter that stopped the construction of the dam in Tennessee? The King Ranch would be great...can wild horses and Santa Gertrudis cattle co-exist? Thanks for your comment!

 
At October 10, 2009 4:02 PM, Blogger Fran Jurga said...

Reply to Anonymous #2--I wonder where you get your information? I have worked with HSUS a lot over the years and also worked on supplying photos for their great book, HSUS Complete Guide to Horse Care. Have you seen that book? It's all about showing and riding and all sorts of horse activities and how to take good care of the horses. It's equivalent to the British Horse Society manual and certainly doesn't discourage people from riding or participating in sports with horses, wild or otherwise.

I'd discourage people from eating or wearing horses, too. (Who's promoting wearing horses?)

Do you have HSUS confused with PETA?

There are so many organizations out there, you really do never quite not know who you are talking to or about, sometimes. Even within a single breed, there can be radical differences of politics.

And issues change. You might disagree with an org on one issue, and agree on another, so be careful about condemning anyone. That some org might be in your state campaigning to help on a horse issue that will benefit or protect you as a landowner or horseowner.

You never know!

I think I'd

 
At October 11, 2009 9:04 AM, Anonymous Barbara said...

Salazar plan is just "Managing for extinction". It moves more wild horses off their legal herd management areas and calls for more birth control. Already only 25% of the herds are genetically viable and sustainable.
Also there are not 69,000 wild horses left free or in captivity. Those in holding are not allowed to breed and those in the preserves won't be allowed to either. Soon our wild horses will just die out and be extinct. I think this is what is planned so that the welfare ranchers will be happy and can take over all the western public lands.

 
At October 11, 2009 10:03 AM, Blogger Fran Jurga said...

Hi Barbara, and thanks for your comment. From what I have read, the wild horses "in the wild" would be subject to birth control to keep them at current population levels. Have you read something different? Or are you just implying that the BLM can't be trusted to follow this plan?

I would think that there would have to be some reproduction at the sanctuaries or else there would be a non-realistic representation of wild horses and visitors would simply see aging adult horses.

Like I said, stay tuned for more details...I wish I could devote all my efforts to this one story! I think it is really important.

 
At October 11, 2009 10:12 AM, Anonymous Lyn said...

I do not trust the BLM and feel that they have a bigger plan and it does not include keeping the wild horse herds alive and well. They want them gone and they have a deep dark plan to get it done. Giving so many mares an unproven contraceptive in such a hurried fashion is very troubling. There are going to be a lot of dead or deformed babies in the future. It would save the taxpayers a lot of money if the BLM would just give back all the land that was set aside for the wild horses in the 1971 Wild Horse Annie bill that they have stolen. That would be millions of acres that would be no cost to taxpayers and the horses would have enough room to move around. During the Pryor Mountain round up only one horse was kept because she was too thin; she was a yearling mother with a baby at her side. All the others were fat and healthy, so how can the BLM say they are starving? And 20 years old for a domestic is good so things out on the range must really be good when many of the horses were almost 20 years old. How can they say the conditions on the range are bad when wild horses are living so long? I have always heard that 15 years was very old for a wild horse. I feel that managing the wild horse and burro herds is a conflict of interest for the BLM, a department that is in charge of managing the land for special interests. The horses need to be managed by a department that will have the welfare of the horses in mind, not the bottom line of others.

 
At October 11, 2009 12:06 PM, Blogger MorganG said...

Lyn I could not agree with you more. The BLM has made a complete mess of the WH&B management and operates in secrecy and misinformation. Where is the yearly report that they were to have out 4 months ago? Where are the 07 and 08 stats that were taken off their website? Why is the WHIMS tracking software taken down? And now we are going to rip perfectly healthy horses off their homelands in roundups that result in injuries and deaths to put them in a tourist mecca. I am completely at a loss as to why people are in any way supporting this inane and dangerous plan. I think this a huge slap in the face to all who have given years of their lives in support of the wild horse and burro on their homeland in their WILD. Why not press for the continuation of the wild horse territories, returning the millions of acres that were stolen from them, ranges without fences giving these horses access to forage and water? I notice no one is asking for elk or catte to be gathered in a most terrifying manner and moved back East. Oh yeah, you can shoot and eat elk and catte.

 
At October 11, 2009 1:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In response to Fran Jurga, "a non-realistic representation of wild horses and visitors would simply see aging adult horses" is exactly what Salazar's plan will lead to: the herds on the preserves will be non-reproducing and will therefore lack the social dynamics that characterize wild horses and make them so fascinating. Wild horses should be viewed in their natural Western environment and expressing their natural social behavior. Captive, gelded, non-reproducing herds hardly convey the majesty of these icons of the West.

IN addition, removing thousands upon thousands of horses from their legally allocated range to move them into government-run facilities is not in keeping with the intent of the 1971 Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act, which aimed at preserving the horses "where presently found." Removal for long-term care is contrary to Congress's intent to protect the horses from capture "as components of the public lands."

The preserves will just be an outlet for more roundups, as our wild herds are privatized and move toward extinction at the hands of the government and the behest of greedy public lands ranchers.

 
At October 13, 2009 9:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The more simple something is the more complicated people make it. Americans want wild horses not run around and think you are a wild horse. balanced natural .predator based environments. They have them in the blm but they don't mention them. Never have they rounded up one horse, don't have to. check on the border from Navada and Calf. Cattle ranchers don't like predator. How much to we have to give up for 3 % of the nations beef. The true cost of a navada steak would blow your mind.

 
At October 13, 2009 5:59 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmmmm.....I find it curious that of ten comments thus far, not one (until now) has come out in opposition to the proposed extension of wild horse habitat (in this discussion). We wouldn't be deleting negative comments now... would we, Fran?
In this time of economic stress in much of the nation, does noone else think spending $700,000 on wild horse maintenance to be almost obscene? To say nothing of the hypocrisy of the people who in one breath criticize private breeders for bringing more foals into the market as irresponsible, and the cause of the slump in prices, but who then insist that the 'wild' herds need more room to roam! And...heaven forbid that any efforts at birth control or euthanasia be utilized to manage the numbers - of course, that wouldn't be natural! Personally, I may start contacting other private breeders to ask if they would join me in an effort to see the wild horse 'adoption' program banned on the basis of placing the government in direct competition with citizens in the horse business for the domestic horse sales market - and using taxpayer dollars to do it, no less!!!!

 
At October 13, 2009 6:11 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oops.....I made an error in my previous statement....it's not $700,000 that's being spent on this program - it's closer to $700, 000,000 if I remember correctly! As I said.... obscene!

 
At October 13, 2009 6:53 PM, Blogger Fran Jurga said...

Anonymous,

You are correct, my name is Fran. Fran Jurga. My name is signed to everything I write.

What's yours?

I would delete comments that are abusive, pornographic, rude or spamming.

Readers are always welcome to post their opinions and many do on a regular basis, both pro and con the news and opinions expressed here.

The opinions expressed in my article are those of Madeleine Pickens, HSUS and me, in this case, on the tenor of politics.

Perhaps you mistook comments from Ms Pickens or HSUS to be coming from me?

Ms Pickens and HSUS endorsed the DOI plan; I asked people to read the original document from Salazar and his comments and get involved in the evolution of this proposal into something everyone will endorse.

That is possible, even in this age of polar politics. I still believe that.

 
At October 13, 2009 10:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Las Vegas I-Team and veteran reporter George Knapp's Special Investigative Report, "Stampede To Oblivion", is now available on line with a link to the show in its entirety.

http://www.americanherds.blogspot.com/

PLEASE URGE EVERYONE YOU KNOW TO WATCH THIS TIMELY AND IN DEPTH REPORT ON THE CURRENT STATE OF THE WILD HORSE & BURRO PROGRAM!

 
At October 22, 2009 8:02 AM, Blogger Kathryn said...

If they put wild horses on fescue pasture in the east, it would be a good opportunity to document changes in feet and incidence of laminitis and colic. Mirror Brian Hampson's work in NZ and AU. This would be a great study project for a grad student somewhere.
Katy Watts

 
At November 11, 2009 3:49 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Comments Needed By Nov 12: Please send in comments to stop the BLM from rounding 2,500 wild horse in northwest Nevada (80% of the populations being rounded up).

https://secure2.convio.net/ida/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=1337&JServSessionIdr003=607gteeb42.app43b

Thank you.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home